Home Citroënët home

Site search powered by FreeFind
Do NOT include 'Citroen' in your search terms



New Citroën C4 Cactus Flair Puretech 130  test


Click
                                          for large image

Citroën UK loaned me a car to test and this was delivered to me from Coventry. The chap who delivered it was very pleasant but I was surprised when he mentioned “hydro-elastic springs”.  Following some of the apparently questionable decisions made by Citroën, this confirmed my preconceptions; that the company has no concept or knowledge of its own heritage. And then, to my surprise, it transpired that he works for a company that delivers press cars to journalists. So Citroën UK cannot be held accountable for this.
I drove him to the local railway station and over the course of a six mile round trip that I do quite often, another preconception was shattered.  This thing has an excellent ride. More on this later…
When I got home, I delved into the 119 pages long handbook and thought to myself, do I really have to read this in its entirety in order to be able to take advantage of the car’s many features? This is one of the things I find intensely annoying when driving a hire car (especially when abroad and the handbook is written in a language I do not understand) and I have often thought it would be a good idea for manufacturers to supply a ‘getting started’ guide. Underneath the owner’s manual (which is entitled ‘basic guide’) was a service and maintenance book and lurking underneath that in the wallet was a 12page ‘Ready To Go’ booklet.  Hooray! Another preconception proved wrong… But the 119 page ‘Basic Guide’ is not the full version – that is to be found on-line.

Click
                                          for large image

As with all modern cars, the Cactus has very thick screen pillars and while these undoubtedly improve a car’s crash-worthiness, they do restrict visibility. Many is the time people have pulled out in front of me and I have found myself wondering why. The answer, of course, is that they didn’t see me because their view was obstructed.

In order to see properly when pulling out of a side road, it is necessary to lean forward and both my wife (who is 5’7” or 170 cm) and I (who am 6’ or 183 cm) found that our heads made contact with the sunvisor. Lowering the seat might prevent this from happening but we both prefer a high driving position,  especially in a car with such ahigh waistline, and were it not for the glass roof, the interior would be rather claustrophobic. To counter any residual claustrophobia, the interior makes effective use of light colours.

The high waistline also means that both the front and rear screens are quite shallow and the view in the interior mirror is restricted.  Fortunately, when manoeuvring, the ‘tablet’ displays what is happening behind. The car is also fitted with a blind spot monitoring function which would be unnecessary were visibility better.

The wipers, front and rear, are also very small but the front pair cover the screen effectively.

Click
                                          for large image

The seats are very comfortable, albeit firmer than one has come to expect in a Citroën and there is plenty of room inside with lots of cubbyholes and storage spaces.

One oddity was the asymmetric air vents –there is but a single one for the front passenger but the driver gets two. However, the aircon was very effective in both front seats. I did not test its efficacy in the rear.

The car is very quiet, apart from a slight whistling around the screen pillars at speed. When extended, the engine noise is noticeable, but not at all unpleasant.

I disliked the non-round steering wheel but suspect I would get used to it in time. My wife thought that the steering was over-light and I disliked the strong centring action but again, I would probably get used to it. My wife approached the steering from the viewpoint of a Xsara Picasso driver – her car’s steering is a bit heavier than this car’s. I came to it from a C6 where the steering is very light at low speeds. The Cactus’ turning circle is excellent.

Click
                                          for large image

The car was thrown very slightly off course when I hit some unavoidable standing water during a torrential downpour but the electronics cut in very quickly and corrected its trajectory.

Again, probably in order to meet safety standards, the sills are quite high. An elderly neighbour who suffers from reduced mobility said she found it difficult to get in and out of the car. The boot too suffers from a high sill. We used the Cactus to do our weekly shop and it was not very easy to lift heavy bags over the sill. Dog owners might find that the high boot sill rules the Cactus out. The boot is, however, very roomy. The tailgate is very light indeed.

The Lane Departure Warning System (LDWS) seemed over-sensitive; it sounded when the white line had not been crossed and the triggering speed is, in my opinion, set too low. This is especially irritating on country lanes where one frequently crosses the line. I would deactivate it if it were my car. The LDWS on my C6 is far less irritating although road markings such as direction arrows do catch it out. I did not notice this with the Cactus.

As a driver of an automatic, I found six gears were too much like hard work but there is a dash indicator saying when to change up/down which, in the absence of a rev counter is a good idea. The gear lever is spring-loaded to the third/fourth plane but despite this, I sometimes found myself in the wrong gear or unable to remember which gear I was in. (This is probably more a criticism of me than of the car since my wife had no such difficulties.)

The engine is very torquey right across the rev band and, coupled with the six speed box, makes the car quite quick, and presumably economical. Economy is undoubtedly helped by the Stop/Start system which is intelligent enough to start the engine when traffic lights go green – provided the camera can see the light. The Stop/Start system was unobtrusive in operation, unlike that fitted to a Skoda I hired in the Czech republic. The same cameras read speed limit signs and display these on the instrument panel.

One piece of C6 technology that sadly hasn’t made it into the Cactus is the Head Up Display of speedo and other information.

I did not check the Active Safety Braking because I could not find a volunteer to step out in front of the car and because I do not have absolute faith in electronics and did not want to damage the car should my lack of faith turn out to be justified.  For the same reason, I did not test the Park Assist feature. The Hill Start Assist worked perfectly.

I also tested the Driver Attention Alert system which warns the driver when it detects lateral movement relative to the road or lane margins and this too worked.

A recent study by the University of Michigan investigated how drivers used blind spot warning systems and, unsurprisingly, discovered that people driving cars with blind spot detection systems frequently changed lanes without ever checking for other vehicles on their own. This would seem to indicate that many drivers use safety systems as a primary source of input rather than as a backup. I prefer to make my own judgments and decisions and find many of the driving aids irritating and/or distracting. But all manufacturers are fitting them and Citroën can’t afford to be left out.

Click
                                          for large image

I had some difficulty programming the satnav; I was unable to discover how to enter numbers. All was revealed when I looked at the manual. But I happen to think that it is bad design if one cannot use it intuitively. I must admit I approached the ‘tablet display’ with some trepidation but satnav aside, found it generally intuitive to use. I did, however, find that when in Satnav mode, the continual changes to the display as it re-orientates itself were obtrusive, unlike the C6 unit (which suffers from lag) and my Garmin which seems just about right. The Cactus’ satnav talks with a pleasant, albeit slightly plummy voice unlike the Garmin which sounds bossy and the C6 which schizophrenically speaks with two voices. The Cactus also made a better job of pronouncing place names than either of the other two satnavs mentioned above. The ‘tablet’ is a great improvement over the ergonomic disaster that is the C6’s dash. Staying with electronics, we take an elderly and deaf neighbour to church and she got into the Cactus and said there was a loud whistling coming through her hearing aid. This suggests to me that the electronics are not properly shielded. And this is not new because every time I drive past a local army base, my C6 beeps at me as a message comes up saying ‘suspension fault’ which Lexia says is a temporary fault. The base is next to the Museum of Army Flying in Middle Wallop and I have been told that visitors to the museum have found themselves locked out of their cars; cars unlocked when they had definitely been locked; failure to start; inability to release electric parking brakes; alarms going off for no apparent reason; and lots of other electronic glitches - so this is not peculiar to Citroën. Citroën UK said no-one else had reported an issue with hearing aids in any car in the range. The whistling may of course be a problem with her hearing aid - she said it only affected the left one - or it may have been caused by the car and my iPhone trying to pair with each other – unsuccessfully until I deactivated and then reactivated Bluetooth on my phone.

Click
                                          for large image

Handling and grip were beyond reproach at normal and legal road speeds. The steering loaded up nicely on a very tight radius slip road off the A303, offering plenty of feel and little body roll.
So, what of the ride? I touched on this in the introduction. Citroën’s press release makes the following claims: Citroën's expertise in the field of suspension is undisputed. For 98 years, suspension comfort has been embedded in the brand's genes. Over the years, customers have grown attached to Citroën’s renowned comfort, which is unique in the market. Drawing on its expertise and the know-how of its engineers, Citroën has developed the new suspension system to further improve the ride quality that is so typical of the brand. The way it works is quite simple. Whilst conventional suspension systems use a shock absorber, a spring and mechanical bump stops at each corner of the car, the Progressive Hydraulic Cushions™ (PHC) system adds two hydraulic stops on each suspension unit to replace the mechanical stops. There is one hydraulic stop for compression and one for decompression. The suspension therefore works in two stages to match how the car is being used.

  •  For light compression and decompression, the springs and shock absorbers control the vertical movements, with no assistance required from the hydraulic stops. However, the presence of these new hydraulic stops means the engineers have greater freedom in the car’s set up, allowing them to offer a ‘magic carpet ride’ with the impression that the car is gliding over uneven ground.
  • During major impacts, the springs and shock absorbers work together with the hydraulic compression or decompression stops that gradually slow the movement to avoid sudden jolts at the end of the range. Unlike a traditional mechanical stop, which absorbs energy and then returns part of it as a rebound, the hydraulic stop absorbs and dissipates this energy. With this innovative technical solution, New C4 Cactus offers incomparable levels of comfort, whilst taking nothing away from the car’s handling and driving pleasure.
Click
                                          for large image

On Hampshire’s pot-holed and broken surfaces, especially at urban speeds, it acquitted itself very well. There was little body roll and no pitching under acceleration or braking. However, on the A 3057 between Stockbridge and Romsey , there is a stretch with an undulating surface where the speed limit has, over recent years been reduced from 60 to 50 and now 40 mph as a result of cars losing their exhausts. I suspect that the installation of new speed limit signs is cheaper than flattening out the road. On this stretch of road, at 40 mph, the ride was nothing special and increasing my speed slightly led to noticeable pitching and yawing. I got the feeling that the front and rear were out of synchronisation with each other with the rear feeling noticeably firmer than the front. Of course front and rear suspensions have different jobs to do so it is inevitable that they will have slightly different characteristics. However, my C6 used to glide serenely along here at 60 when the NSL still applied. Nevertheless, the Cactus was way ahead of my wife’s Xsara Picasso, which crashes through, to the bump stops. On less extreme surfaces, the Cactus’ ride is excellent although a little bit of road noise is transmitted into the cabin. The ride quality is very good, albeit unlike that of a hydropneumatic car. The difference is undoubtedly due to the latter’s infinitely rising rate characteristics which provides a unique feel. To put this into plain English, the harder a gas spring is compressed, the stiffer it becomes whereas conventional springs maintain pretty much the same ‘stiffness’ whether fully compressed or not. Additionally, there is the lack of self-levelling to consider. I did not test the Cactus fully laden so have no idea how the handling and ride changes. It is worth adding that not everyone likes the hydropneumatic ride quality. A colleague observed, “Citroëns make me feel nauseous.” She was talking about hydropneumatic cars and added that she likes (sports) cars with firm suspension. I did not invite her to have a ride in the Cactus since I didn’t want to have to clean the interior…

Click
                                          for large image

A friend has an ‘old’ Cactus and we did a back-to-back comparison of the two. Firstly, from an aesthetic point of view, it must be said I prefer the old model which, with its airbumps, has more character and is much more distinctive. Appearance is a matter of opinion and I think that much of the current Citroën range looks rather bland and anonymous. Remove the chevrons and they could be anything.
A brief drive in both demonstrated the superiority of the new suspension system; not that the old one is bad. Interestingly, my friend said he prefers the frontal styling of the new car. If this report seems somewhat negative, this is probably more to do with my expectations of what a car should be like than with any specific shortcomings in the Cactus. Were I in the market for a new car, the Cactus would not qualify; primarily because of the high boot lip which our dog would be unable to cope with. And since she is a German Shepherd dog, lifting her in and out is not an option; I could live with the electronics; I am impressed by the ride quality; and with familiarity, the looks might grow on me.
The progressive hydraulic cushions are what sets the Cactus apart from other cars and hopefully, they will be extended across the range in due course and Citroën will regain its reputation for making cars that both ride and handle well.

Click
                                          for large image


© 2018 Citroënët