|
Citroën
C3 1,4 HDi road test
The
huge amount of headroom creates a sense of spaciousness in the front of
which M. Boulanger doubtless would have approved. However, there is
very little leg room in the rear.
Whether M. Boulanger would
consider the C3 to be a “new 2CV” (as some of the media have described
it) is not a moot point. It is not a replacement for the 2CV. Yes, it
serves a not dissimilar role inasmuch as it is very economical and yes,
from some angles its shape is reminiscent of that of the 2CV but that
is as far as it goes. Where the 2CV was very light, the C3 is not.
Where the 2CV offered superb ride comfort, rivalled only by
hydropneumatic suspension systems, the C3 is rock
hard
in a way that is all too familiar to anyone who has driven a German
car. The basket of eggs would have been turned into an omelette had I
tried driving across a ploughed field. Where the 2CV’s styling was born
out of practicality, the C3 is modern retro-chic. Where the 2CV could
be maintained by anyone with a set of spanners, a can of castor oil and
a hammer, the C3 requires electronic diagnostic gear. And although the
C3 currently occupies a position towards the bottom of Citroën’s range,
the role of entry level car will be occupied by the forthcoming C2.
|
|
|
|
|
As
with all the other modern Citroëns I have driven recently, I think it
is a very competent car. It has distinctive looks, it handles superbly,
it is economical, the electronics are unobtrusive and the controls are
easy to use. But it leaves me cold. The missing ingredients appear to
be ride comfort and passion. Given the Gallic reputation for passion,
this omission is surprising. It appears to me that whereas the C5 is
the best American car that Citroën has built since the 1930s, the C3 is
the best German car that the company has built.
My thanks to Southgate Citroën for the loan of the car and to Jeff Colmer of Totally 2CV
in Romsey for permission to photograph the C3 alongside some 2CVs.
|
|